Thanks for catching these. They will get updated in the next revision. Paul
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Dale R. Worley <[email protected]> wrote: > "Xianghaizhou (A)" <[email protected]> writes: > > This idea sound great, Did you propose any draft? > > No... I suppose I should, just to have a fixed point to base the > discussion on. > > BTW, looking at draft-xiang-nvo3-geneve-packet-spray-00, at the end of > section 5.3 is: > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > |Ver| Opt Len |O|C| Rsvd. | Protocol Type | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Virtual Network Identifier (VNI) | Reserved | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Option Class = GFP | Type=Capacity |R|R|R| Length=8| > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | MAX GROUP ID | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > Capability notification message format > > In the third word, the "Length" field has the value 1, which indicates > that the option contains one word of option data. Compare with the > figure at the end of section 5.1. > > Also, the definition of MAX GROUP ID is > > MAX GROUP ID is a four byte field. MAX Group ID indicate the max > Group ID assigned to the destination. The Group ID allocated by the > source must be limited to 0 ~ MAX Group ID. > > It might be more convenient to set "The Group ID allocated by the source > must be limited to 0 ~ (MAX Group ID - 1)." > > Dale >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
