Well, not without breaking every asic implementation out there. On Sat, Mar 24, 2018, 2:47 AM Dale R. Worley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul Congdon <[email protected]> writes: > > I'm not sure your proposal is compatible with how the type/length field > and > > ethertype field are distinguished. If the first octet is less than 0x06, > > then the field is a type/length field per 802.3. > > > > https://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/tut/ethertype.pdf > > True, but there's no reason to put a packet length field in the Geneve > header; all ethertypes are 0x0600 or higher. So we can give different > meanings to values of that field that start with 0x00-0x05 > > Dale >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
