On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:10:55 -0500 "Anurag S. Maskey" <Anurag.Maskey at Sun.COM> wrote:
[...]
> I wasn't planning on doing that (with the gun ;) ), but I did think
> about checking the name of the NCP for the read-only status this morning.
What do you mean by checking? I think a special namespace for
read-only NCPs would be worse then a side list as we might want to
allow users in the future to specify NCPs as read-only and having to
change the name in order to do this would be cumbersome.
mph
