On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:14 -0500
"Anurag S. Maskey" <Anurag.Maskey at Sun.COM> wrote:
> I'm looking into moving all the "read-only" aspects of NCP, NCU, ENM,
> and LOC to the library.
> Thus, rather than the CLI checking if a property or object is read-only,
> the library returns NWAM_ENTITY_READ_ONLY error. The GUI can also rely
> on the library for read-only properties/objects.
OK. Make sure you add a note in the README as to the implementation of
this.
mph
>
> Anurag
>
>
> Michael Hunter wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:10:55 -0500
> > "Anurag S. Maskey" <Anurag.Maskey at Sun.COM> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I wasn't planning on doing that (with the gun ;) ), but I did think
> >> about checking the name of the NCP for the read-only status this morning.
> >>
> >
> > What do you mean by checking? I think a special namespace for
> > read-only NCPs would be worse then a side list as we might want to
> > allow users in the future to specify NCPs as read-only and having to
> > change the name in order to do this would be cumbersome.
> >
> > mph
> > _______________________________________________
> > nwam-dev mailing list
> > nwam-dev at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> nwam-dev mailing list
> nwam-dev at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev
