Michael Hunter wrote: > On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:52:36 -0500 > "Anurag S. Maskey" <Anurag.Maskey at Sun.COM> wrote: > > [...] > >> The flag gives consumers of libnwam the control over how they want the >> objects to be walked. >> > > The only parts of the code that depend on ordering want it sorted. > > >> This RFE is adding to the functionality that >> exists, not replacing it. >> > > Right now there is no guaranteed order functionality. > > >> If the consensus is that the walk be sorted >> without actually changing the ordering in the files, then the flag is >> not necessary. >> > > This makes the most sense to me. > You mean you prefer that the walk always be sorted without having to specify the flag or changing the order of objects in the files (which is contrary to Alan's preference in the bug comments)?
Anurag
