How about giving the node owners full control of their nodes, including making decision on what information that they want to publish (as opposed to a central sysadmin person) --- while at the same time taking full responsibility of the published node information in regard to, among others, privacy and accuracy?
Why should it even need to have a sysadmin to be blamed for the privacy issue? On 21 Aug 2002, Adam Shand wrote: > On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 17:26, Don Park wrote: > > if its important that permission be granted, and im not sure that it is, > > the right thing to do is to erase the database. Drop it all and rebuild it > > with a new boolean that says 'agreed to terms of use'. > > i agree that's the only "sure" way, but what a pain in the ass. i was > hoping someone had a better idea. > > what about if we put out word on all the relevant lists and give people > time to erase their data, or only move data that has valid email > addresses and email them all and only move them if they reply saying > okay? > > it's just work that someone has to do. > > adam. > > -- > "Make the invisible visible. Let people see." -- Bruce Sterling > > -- > NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ > Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ > Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/ > -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
