Users don't care if your html is valid (except maybe, developers, but
they do not represent the general population). If you want to waste
hours of time making a site valid, then go for it - but I'd be a
pretty pissed off customer if I was paying for it, and while gaining
absolutely zero ROI. I'd rather you spend that time *actually testing*
the site on different web browsers, after-all as I'm sure you are all
aware, a valid site != a working site. A shipped product is more
valuable than a perfect one.
-Nick

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bruce Clement
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been using this quote in my signature file for a while. Today I
> think I'll headline with it.
>
> "Before attempting to create something new, it is vital to have a good
> appreciation of everything that already exists in this field." Mikhail
> Kalashnikov
>
> This forum is populated by experienced php developers who use php and
> W3C standards to generate real-world websites. They exchange useful
> information and help each other out. Even if you think you know
> better, standards are important, and just saying that a standards
> validator is "Stupid" only shows how much you have to learn. The
> reason standards are important here is because a standards compliant
> website has a greater chance of working with as yet unreleased browser
> versions than a non-compliant one has.
>
> You got one reply to your posting about your site giving what I
> consider to be pointing out a basic and easy to fix problem which you
> replied 3 times to with increasing levels of petulance.
>
> According to my records this thread is the second time you've posted
> on this forum. The other being a one liner "2 hrs to research find out
> how, and implement" comment on another thread. Giving you constructive
> criticism on your site as Boyd did is hardly tall poppy. In this list,
> you are not a tall poppy, people like Jochen, Harvey, and Aaron
> (amongst others) are and they don't rant and rave when people point
> out mistakes they make.
>
> I'm a database & back-end developer, not a website designer, so
> there's no point complaining about my sites, but I am currently the
> customer for having a few dozen of my domain names developed into
> small websites. The people I'm working with on this project are mature
> adults who accept a task and deliver to spec (or they stop getting
> commissions). If one of them told me they wouldn't use a dictionary
> because it was stupid they would get no further work. I expect basic
> things like spelling and grammar from content writers, W3C compliance
> from web developers and laces in shoes; if I don't get them I spend my
> money elsewhere.
>
> Last I was looking to hire a web developer I looked critically at
> their website on the basis that their own website is their advert and
> should represent their best possible work. This wasn't just a surface
> examination, I carefully examined their html as well. If it wasn't of
> the required quality I simply moved along.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:46 AM, vincenz2004 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> p.s. My site renders 4 errors on your checksum validator (which I dont
>> use cause its stupid).
>> and facebook.com gets 40 errors...
>>
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http://www.facebook.com
>>
>> Why dont you write to facebook and teach them how to write valid code
>> too?
>>
>> On Mar 15, 12:23 pm, Boyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> cutting edge is great, but so is getting the basics right, how about
>>> valid html for a start
>>>
>>> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediacre...
>>>
>>> On Mar 15, 11:49 am, vincenz2004 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>>
>>> > We would like to offer contracted web programming services through our
>>> > company if anyone is looking for a developer.
>>>
>>> > We specialize in Social Networking scripting but practically
>>> > everything else.
>>>
>>> > We like cutting edge projects, so if you have one let us know ;)
>>>
>>> > Feel free to visit our site.
>>>
>>> >http://www.mediacreations.co.nz
>>>
>>> > Cheers!
>>>
>>> > Vince
>>
>> --
>> NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
>> To post, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, send email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bruce Clement
>
> Home:   http://www.clement.co.nz/
> Twitter:        http://twitter.com/Bruce_Clement
> Google Buzz: http://www.google.com/profiles/aotearoanz
>
> "Before attempting to create something new, it is vital to have a good
> appreciation of everything that already exists in this field." Mikhail
> Kalashnikov
>
> --
> NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
> To post, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, send email to
> [email protected]

-- 
NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to