Providing you code to a standard that will validate from the start of the project, then I don't believe it will take any additional time.
It should also offer some form of future proofing, providing future browsers adhere to standards. I think that in itself is a form of ROI. My 2c anyway. Thanks, Nathan. http://www.kennedytechnology.com Telerobotics project: http://control.kennedytechnology.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Jenkin Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2010 3:17 p.m. To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [phpug] Re: web programming and development services or consultation Users don't care if your html is valid (except maybe, developers, but they do not represent the general population). If you want to waste hours of time making a site valid, then go for it - but I'd be a pretty pissed off customer if I was paying for it, and while gaining absolutely zero ROI. I'd rather you spend that time *actually testing* the site on different web browsers, after-all as I'm sure you are all aware, a valid site != a working site. A shipped product is more valuable than a perfect one. -Nick -- NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
