Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it make sense to "optimize" the persistence in that we wouldn't store > the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured?
Yes, though the default type should be something like "oak:unstructured" or "jr3:unstructured" that isn't orderable like "nt:unstructured". BR, Jukka Zitting
