Hi, Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
> Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Would it make sense to "optimize" the persistence in that we wouldn't store >> the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured? > > Yes, though the default type should be something like > "oak:unstructured" or "jr3:unstructured" that isn't orderable like > "nt:unstructured". Do we need a namespace ? How about just "Unstructured" ? Regards Felix
