Hi, So we can consider the vote has failed due to the licencing issue.
I see that we already have one commit on the trunk, so in order to minimize the noise maybe cutting 0.3 at the end of may is a better option? alex On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > >The troublesome files come with the following header: > > > >/* > > * Copyright 2004-2011 H2 Group. Multiple-Licensed under the H2 License, > > * Version 1.0, and under the Eclipse Public License, Version 1.0 > > * (http://h2database.com/html/license.html). > > * Initial Developer: H2 Group > > */ > > > >I suppose they may well have originally written by Thomas and that he > >could simply relicense them to the ASF, but until then we should treat > >them as EPLv1 code and mention that in the LICENSE.txt file. > > Yes, that was a mistake. I wrote those two classes originally, so I can > relicense them. I have done that in revision 1333334. > > Regards, > Thomas > >
