ok, I'm on it :) Thanks Jukka, good point about the release plugin.
Release vote will follow shortly. alex On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Alex Parvulescu > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The simplest way is to also include OAK-82 (this morning's commit) so we > > have a clean trunk for 0.2.1. > > Sounds good. > > > What should the release notes say about the licencing issue? > > Something like "The earlier 0.2 release candidate was rejected because > of a minor licensing issue that is now resolved." should be fine. Or > just not mention it at all. It's only relevant as an explanation of > why we're releasing 0.2.1 instead of 0.2 after the 0.1 release. > > > ah, forgot. I also have to rollback the version from 0.3-SNAPSHOT to > > 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT that also includes the changes. > > The Maven release plugin allows you to set the release version to > 0.2.1 even when you start from 0.3-SNAPSHOT. Just tell it to reset the > snapshot version back to 0.3-SNAPSHOT after cutting the release. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
