Hi, I would prefer if the "Scalability and performance review" would start earlier.
Regards, Thomas On 6/28/12 1:43 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >We missed pushing the 0.3 release out a month ago, but let's fix that >by cutting the release instead of 0.4 now at the turn of the month. > >And since we're reaching the end of the initial roadmap [1] we drafted >in February, I think it's a good idea to now review where we are and >outline some targets for the next few months. > >First a quick review of the originally outlined release milestones: > >* 0.1 - March 2012 - ALL DONE >* 0.2 - April 2012 - PARTIALLY DONE, STILL MISSING: > * Basic in-cloud persistence > * Runnable jar with "join cluster" functionality > * Integration tests to verify the above >* 0.3 (wasn't released) - May 2012 - ALL DONE >* 0.4 (to be released as 0.3) - June 2012 - PARTIALLY DONE, STILL MISSING: > * Bindings for jQuery > * Basic support for access control based on the extension model > * Basic support for node types based on the extension model > * Basic support for observation based on the extension model > * Basic support for locking (if needed/wanted) > * Integration tests to verify the above > * Performance benchmark against selected other NoSQL databases > * Performance tests for clustered deployments > * Basic scalability tests for simple read and write scenarios > >We're making good progress on things like (basic versions of) >observation and locking, so I guess we'll still be able to know a few >of the above items by the end of the month before cutting the next >release. However, a few items like clustered deployments or >nice-to-have features like jQuery bindings need to be postponed to >future releases. > >Below are a few initial ideas of what we should focus on going forward. > >* July 2012 (0.4) > - Increased coverage of core JCR functionality (node types, >observation, security, etc.) > - Finish the JAAS authentication work > - Full text search based on Lucene > - Integration with Apache Sling >* August 2012 (0.5) > - ACL-based access control > - XML and other batch import features > - Versioning, workspaces, etc. >* September 2012 (0.6) > - Scalability and performance review > - Pass the TCK test of all the JCR features we want to support (i.e. >JCR compliance) > >These are just from the top of my head for now as a discussion >starter. Feel free to disagree with the timing and suggest changes. >The main purpose here is to get a shared understanding of what are the >key areas to work on in the next few months instead of setting hard >deadlines. > >[1] http://markmail.org/thread/7dhxklytr2xaoe24 > >BR, > >Jukka Zitting
