Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO your schedule for security related tasks is way too > ambitious and i don't see that happen within the timeframe you > stated below.
Fair enough, you have a much better view of how much effort implementing these features requires and how much time you or others who could implement them have available in near future. I'm coming at this more from a top-down perspective of how different parts could ideally come together, but of course we also need to take other constraints into account. What do you think would be a reasonable roadmap/timescale for the security features? If we already know that these features won't be available until later, then we can adjust the other parts of the roadmap accordingly (for example we already know that our performance benchmarks won't tell the full story until we have also ACL evaluation in place). BR, Jukka Zitting
