[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13421322#comment-13421322
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-182:
------------------------------------
> I think the ValidatingEditor shouldn't ignore hidden content... the
> MergingNodeStateDiff class probably shouldn't ignore hidden content.
For index content, I don't agree. I see no reason to validate or merge changes
in the index. The only hidden content I aware of is index content.
But the tests seem to work now, so I will not change add the filtering to
ValidatingEditor and MergingNodeStateDiff. I guess we will come back to this
once it's a performance problem.
Also, I will change NodeStateUtils.isHidden() to support simple names only.
> Support for "invisible" internal content
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-182
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-182
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core, jcr
> Reporter: Jukka Zitting
> Attachments: OAK-182-b.patch
>
>
> As discussed on the mailing list
> (http://markmail.org/message/kzt7csiz2bd5n3ww), it would be good to have a
> naming pattern line "{{:name}}" for internal content that we don't want to
> directly expose to JCR clients.
> JCR-related functionality like the namespace and node type validators and the
> observation dispatcher (see also OAK-181) should know to ignore such content
> and the JCR binding in oak-jcr should automatically filter out such internal
> content. Such internal content should probably also not be indexed for search.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
