2012/10/1 Julian Reschke <[email protected]>: > > I'm not sure that it's a good idea to call something "Jackrabbit" that is so > different in what it supports compared to "current" Jackrabbit. > Just from the peanut gallery: we did the same years ago with Cocoon, the 2.0 version was 100% different than every previous version, even migration was not possible. And it worked out pretty well - in the beginning everyone referenced the new version as "Cocoon 2" (like JR 3) in contrast to just "Cocoon" for the old one. But over time this changed and wasn't a problem at all.
Regards Carsten > If people want to keep maintaining "classic" Jackrabbit, they should be able > to do so without having to worry about name confusion. > > Best regards, Julian -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
