On 2012-10-01 15:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
2012/10/1 Julian Reschke <[email protected]>:
I'm not sure that it's a good idea to call something "Jackrabbit" that is so
different in what it supports compared to "current" Jackrabbit.
Just from the peanut gallery: we did the same years ago with Cocoon,
the 2.0 version was 100% different than every previous version, even
migration was not possible. And it worked out pretty well - in the
beginning everyone referenced the new version as "Cocoon 2" (like JR
3) in contrast to just "Cocoon" for the old one. But over time this
changed and wasn't a problem at all.
Regards
Carsten
Offlist: wenn das nächste CQ auf defaultmäßig auf Oak läuft bin ich
überzeugt :-)
