Hi Simo, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > ...if you like the approach I described on > OAK-529 (patch with testcase included) I think we can discuss on more > additions...
IIUC what you suggest is only dependent on JCR APIs, not on Oak, right? If yes, that might better belong to a JCR commons (sub)project - those sorts of ideas regularly pop up, creating a modular library of such reusable utilities might be useful. -Bertrand
