Hi all! >> If yes, that might better belong to a JCR commons (sub)project - those >> sorts of ideas regularly pop up, creating a modular library of such >> reusable utilities might be useful. > > +1, definitely something for jcr commons.
yes the addition just works for pure JCR APIs, it doesn't require any specific Oak feature... I am providing a new patch to be applied to jcr-commons. Thanks for your feedbacks! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/
