Hi Chetan,

I gave it a try and it looks very nice. Much better
experience than with the basic shell I started.

I¹m not too worried about the size increase, but the
resulting jar file is indeed quite big. Do we really need
all the jars we currently embed? Alternatively we may
want to consider a new module. E.g. oak-console with only
the required jar files to run the console.

Regards
 Marcel

On 22/05/14 18:37, "Chetan Mehrotra" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Currently Marcel has implemented a Java based basic shell access to
>Oak in OAK-1805. I have reworked the logic and used Groovysh [1] to
>provide a richer shell experience.
>
>
>* The shell is branded for Oak
>* Makes use of all the features provided by groovysh command
>completion, history, colored output etc
>* Full power of Groovy!
>* Most of current command implemented by Marcel ported
>* Ability to execute script at command line itself similar to Mongo shell
>
>Things to considers
>* Requires groovy jar to be embedded increasing the size ~6 mb
>* Some of commands need to be written in groovy
>
>Sample output
>
>{noformat}
>$ java -jar oak-run-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar console mongodb://localhost:27017/oak
>Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1-SNAPSHOT
>Jackrabbit Oak Shell (Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1-SNAPSHOT, JVM: 1.6.0_45)
>Type ':help' or ':h' for help.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------------------------------------
>/> ls
>:async
>apps
>bin
>etc
>/> cd
>:async           apps             bin              etc
>home             jcr:system
>libs             oak:index        rep:policy       rep:repoPolicy
>system           tmp
>var
>/> cd var
>/var>
>{noformat}
>
>Adding groovy would increase size of oak-run by ~6 mb (from 27 to 34)
>and also requires some of the code logic to be implemented in Groovy,
>So would it be ok to apply the patch
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Chetan Mehrotra
>PS: Details are also provided in bug note
>[1] http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+Shell
>[2] http://groovy.codehaus.org/JSR-223+access+to+other+JVM+languages

Reply via email to