On 04/08/2014 10:55, Michael Dürig wrote: > ... > Agreed, I think this is the better approach. > ... > Sure. This was just an idea. We can as well leave it out and add it > once we think such a thing is needed. >> Anyhow here is the amended version >> >> http://goo.gl/xUcPdY
If you're fine with the amended version which already include Closeable and custom logger I can file an issue ticket, and push it to trunk. We can work any refactoring/improving from there on. A nice improvements would be to have it as OSGi service registered to the whiteboard for providing different implementations of the same. D.
