On 4.8.14 11:26 , Davide Giannella wrote:
On 04/08/2014 10:55, Michael Dürig wrote:
...
Agreed, I think this is the better approach.
...
Sure. This was just an idea. We can as well leave it out and add it
once we think such a thing is needed.
Anyhow here is the amended version
http://goo.gl/xUcPdY
If you're fine with the amended version which already include Closeable
and custom logger I can file an issue ticket, and push it to trunk. We
can work any refactoring/improving from there on.
Sure, let's go ahead!
Michael
A nice improvements would be to have it as OSGi service registered to
the whiteboard for providing different implementations of the same.
D.
