Hi, I think using "entryCount" is ok. It's anyway only needed until we have proper cost estimation in the property index and ordered index.
Regards, Thomas On 28/10/14 09:32, "Davide Giannella" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 28/10/2014 03:23, [email protected] wrote: >> Author: amitj >> Date: Tue Oct 28 03:23:45 2014 >> New Revision: 1634774 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1634774 >> Log: >> OAK-2200: Tune cost calculation for lucene property index >> Added a configurable param entryCount which defaults to 1000 and >>indicates the max count to be returned by the lucene index. >> >Doesn't `entryCount` for other indexes means the value actually >returned? If so it would be clearer to keep the same behaviour and in >case the "max count returned" is needed introduce a new variable; >something like maxEntryCount. > >D. > >
