Hello team, while debugging for OAK-2226 (with Thomas' help) I discovered two points:
LucenePropertyIndex.getIndexName() always return "lucene" as for the already existing Lucene index implementation. Returning something like "lucene-property" or similar would ease to understand the traces in the debug statements. Then the LucenePropertyIndex is wrapped within the aggregator. Does it make sense to have an aggregated property index? Cheers Davide
