Hi Davide, So far the intention was that we would soon merge LucenePropertyIndex and LuceneIndex into one and not have duplicate logic. However to avoid the confusion above suggestion make sense and I have done them as part of OAK-2239. Can you try with those changes and see if it helps Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Davide Giannella <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello team, > > while debugging for OAK-2226 (with Thomas' help) I discovered two points: > > LucenePropertyIndex.getIndexName() always return "lucene" as for the > already existing Lucene index implementation. Returning something like > "lucene-property" or similar would ease to understand the traces in the > debug statements. > > Then the LucenePropertyIndex is wrapped within the aggregator. Does it > make sense to have an aggregated property index? > > Cheers > Davide > >
