perhaps 'unscheduled' and 'wish list' are very similar indeed - even though I'd have thought of 'unscheduled' more as of 'it should be scheduled soon-ish' - where as 'wish list' would already have gone through the decision process of 'no we dont do this anytime soon but its a good idea so lets not forget it'.
Cheers, Stefan On 7/29/15 9:27 AM, "Angela Schreiber" <[email protected]> wrote: >why not simply marking it as 'unscheduled'? IMO that pretty much >expresses that this is is not yet scheduled but still considered >a valid improvement/bug that we want to address at some point. > >i only resolve issues 'later' or 'wontfix' that i am confident >that will never be fixed. > >adding a 'wish list' fix version will just be another huge container >that we hardly ever look at and i would find it hard to understand >the difference between 'unscheduled' and 'wish list'. > >if something is on your wishlist, i would suggest you assign the >issue to yourself in order to keep track of it (compared to the >whole bunch of other unscheduled issues). or flag it with a >label that allows you to find all your wishes. > >so, rather -1 from my side. > >kind regards >angela > >On 29/07/15 08:58, "Stefan Egli" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Just came across a ticket [0] that has no urgent priority to be fixed in >>1.3 >>but would be a good candidate to be put into the general 'wish list pod'. >> >>Now currently we seem to handle such cases by just closing the ticket. >>This >>imv has the downside of it getting completely lost and forgotten. >> >>We could thus introduce a new 'wish list' fix version that can be set on >>those tickets instead of just closing them. >> >>Wdyt? >> >>Cheers, >>Stefan >>-- >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2613 >> >> >
