I'd rather have it unscheduled or, in case we want it sooner rather than later, scheduled for 1.4.
If we want to ease the searches we can always opt for a label but my feeling is that this label thing is getting out of hand with labels and labels and labels :) Davide On 29/07/2015 09:54, Stefan Egli wrote: > perhaps 'unscheduled' and 'wish list' are very similar indeed - even > though I'd have thought of 'unscheduled' more as of 'it should be > scheduled soon-ish' - where as 'wish list' would already have gone through > the decision process of 'no we dont do this anytime soon but its a good > idea so lets not forget it'. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > On 7/29/15 9:27 AM, "Angela Schreiber" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> why not simply marking it as 'unscheduled'? IMO that pretty much >> expresses that this is is not yet scheduled but still considered >> a valid improvement/bug that we want to address at some point. >> >> i only resolve issues 'later' or 'wontfix' that i am confident >> that will never be fixed. >> >> adding a 'wish list' fix version will just be another huge container >> that we hardly ever look at and i would find it hard to understand >> the difference between 'unscheduled' and 'wish list'. >> >> if something is on your wishlist, i would suggest you assign the >> issue to yourself in order to keep track of it (compared to the >> whole bunch of other unscheduled issues). or flag it with a >> label that allows you to find all your wishes. >> >> so, rather -1 from my side. >> >> kind regards >> angela >> >> On 29/07/15 08:58, "Stefan Egli" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just came across a ticket [0] that has no urgent priority to be fixed in >>> 1.3 >>> but would be a good candidate to be put into the general 'wish list pod'. >>> >>> Now currently we seem to handle such cases by just closing the ticket. >>> This >>> imv has the downside of it getting completely lost and forgotten. >>> >>> We could thus introduce a new 'wish list' fix version that can be set on >>> those tickets instead of just closing them. >>> >>> Wdyt? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stefan >>> -- >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2613 >>> >>> > >
