On 13/08/15 13:58, "Davide Giannella" wrote: >On 13/08/2015 10:17, Stefan Egli wrote: >> I¹d find it more useful (for us) when it would be the cut-date. >> >It's always the cut date in the beginning. Shall we change it then to >the actual release date once it's announced or leave it to the cut date? >:)
I'd leave it at the date the release was cut. this makes it possible to roughly judge whether a commit made it into the release or not. But I'm also fine adjusting the release date once made public... Regards Marcel
