On 13/08/2015 14:15, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > On 13/08/15 13:58, "Davide Giannella" wrote: >> On 13/08/2015 10:17, Stefan Egli wrote: >>> I¹d find it more useful (for us) when it would be the cut-date. >>> >> It's always the cut date in the beginning. Shall we change it then to >> the actual release date once it's announced or leave it to the cut date? >> :) > I'd leave it at the date the release was cut. this makes it > possible to roughly judge whether a commit made it into the > release or not. >
I'm also for sticking to the cut date. It makes more sense from a development POV. For managers who'd like planning keep in mind that the dates are always tentative and adds 3 days on top of it. Davide
