Thanks for the various comments and review on OAK-4006. I've attached a final version of the patch and will push that later this afternoon (together with OAK-4007) unless I hear fresh concern.
Cheers, Stefan On 11/02/16 20:16, "Stefan Egli" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all, > >The recent clusterId-discussions around OAK-3935 together with the cloning >problem it shares with discovery.oak made me rethink the current >two-clusterId-approach. After some offline discussions with Thomas and >Marcel I've created OAK-4006 which suggests reusing the SharedDataStore >way >of a hidden :clusterId property, providing a dedicated 'after clone' >offline >reset tool in oak-run and using that same clusterId also in discovery-lite >(thus discovery.oak). This should leave us with only 1 clusterId in the >stack. > >Since 1.4 will be the first to support discovery.oak, and to allow for >enough testing, it would be important to have this in 1.3.16. I will >therefore work on a patch tomorrow and would highly appreciate comments on >the approach and patch. If +1-ed It should delay 1.3.16 a few hours or a >day. > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4006 > >Cheers, >Stefan > >
