Hi, On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 18:46 +0530, Tulika Goel wrote: > Now for oak 2.0, I see this version name is always generated by doing > a > minor increment for e.g. from 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3. So apparently it > seems oak > 2.0 is creating “Version Name” by doing minor version number > increment.
I am by no means a specialist in JCR versioning, but wanted to point out that there is no Oak 2.0 :-) So it would be nice if you could tell us exactly what version of Oak you're using and maybe someone with more knowledge about versioning will be able to offer actual advice. Robert
