In the meantime, I configured those tests not to run when they are scheduled under a "beam" node. I will send a separate mail to builds@ and put oak-dev@ in CC.
2016-12-08 11:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Munteanu <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, Francesco Mari wrote: >> I analysed the latest builds to figure out what's going on with some >> tests related to Cold Standby. It seems that the problem is >> restricted >> to some Jenkins nodes - see [1] for more details. Can we configure >> the >> Jenkins job not to run on nodes labelled "beam"? >> >> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK- >> 5017?focusedCommentId=15731590&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system. >> issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15731590 > > The job is configured to only run on 'ubuntu' nodes, but it seems that > this restriction is not taken into account. The following Jenkins issue > might be related > > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-23459 > > Perhaps a question better suited to builds@ ? They would be interested > in proper resource utilisation. > > Robert > >> >> 2016-11-25 13:25 GMT+01:00 Francesco Mari <[email protected]>: >> > Every failure in build 1298 is due to "java.net.BindException: >> > Address >> > already in use". According to the build log, the port wasn't bound >> > by >> > a server started during a test. The first failing test >> > (ExternalSharedStoreIT) was also the first test in the build to >> > start >> > a server. The issue persisted for some tests (the whole range of >> > tests >> > in ExternalSharedStoreIT and the first test in FailoverSslTestIT), >> > so >> > I can't deduce any random behaviour. Once the port (presumingly >> > bound >> > to an external process) was released, every other integration test >> > worked without any problem. >> > >> > 2016-11-25 5:38 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra <[email protected] >> > m>: >> > > Per https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20mat >> > > rix/1298/ >> > > the test again failed but mostly on Jdk 1.7. The test on Jdk 1.8 >> > > looks >> > > like passed. >> > > Chetan Mehrotra >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Chetan Mehrotra >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > They are from oak-segment-tar. See >> > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matri >> > > > x/1295/#showFailuresLink >> > > > Chetan Mehrotra >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Francesco Mari >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > Are those from oak-tarmk-standby or oak-segment-tar? >> > > > > >> > > > > 2016-11-22 6:11 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehrotra@gm >> > > > > ail.com>: >> > > > > > Hi Team, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Since last 4-6 builds I am seeing a recurring failure of >> > > > > > few test in >> > > > > > standby module >> > > > > > >> > > > > > * FailoverIPRangeIT >> > > > > > * ExternalPrivateStoreIT >> > > > > > * StandbyTestIT >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Probably something to be looked into >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Chetan Mehrotra >
