Hi, Some of the Oak users are interested in rolling back the Oak upgrade within a branch (like 1.4.10 -> 1.4.1). As far as I understand, it should work, unless some of the commits in (1.4.10, 1.4.10] introduces a repository format change that is not compatible with the previous version (eg. modifies the format of a property in the DocumentMK).
Right now there’s no way to check this other than reviewing all the issues in the given version range related to the given components. Maybe it’d be useful to mark such issues with a label (like “breaks_compatibility”, “non_reversible", “updates_schema”, etc.)? WDYT? Which label should we choose and how we can make sure that it’s really used in appropriate cases? Regards, Tomek -- Tomek Rękawek | Adobe Research | www.adobe.com reka...@adobe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
