Hi Amit

In the light of discussions we had recently wrt modularisation, I would
also prefer to keep the new oak-blob-cloud-azure implementation in a
separate module.

Kind regards
Angela

On 15/03/17 10:29, "Amit Jain" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Team,
>
>There is a new contribution for azure blob storage support - OAK-4933.
>This introduces a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. This certainly seems to
>be the right approach from a separation and deployment standpoint. But in
>terms of code the module may only contain a few classes and also in future
>if we introduce (on my horizon) support for jclouds we could unify all
>under one module.
>
>What is the correct thing to do here?
>
>Thanks
>Amit

Reply via email to