Thanks!! As suggested would go for a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Angela Schreiber <anch...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Amit
> In the light of discussions we had recently wrt modularisation, I would
> also prefer to keep the new oak-blob-cloud-azure implementation in a
> separate module.
> Kind regards
> On 15/03/17 10:29, "Amit Jain" <am...@ieee.org> wrote:
> >Hi Team,
> >There is a new contribution for azure blob storage support - OAK-4933.
> >This introduces a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. This certainly seems to
> >be the right approach from a separation and deployment standpoint. But in
> >terms of code the module may only contain a few classes and also in future
> >if we introduce (on my horizon) support for jclouds we could unify all
> >under one module.
> >What is the correct thing to do here?