Hi, Thanks!! As suggested would go for a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure.
Regards Amit On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Amit > > In the light of discussions we had recently wrt modularisation, I would > also prefer to keep the new oak-blob-cloud-azure implementation in a > separate module. > > Kind regards > Angela > > On 15/03/17 10:29, "Amit Jain" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi Team, > > > >There is a new contribution for azure blob storage support - OAK-4933. > >This introduces a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. This certainly seems to > >be the right approach from a separation and deployment standpoint. But in > >terms of code the module may only contain a few classes and also in future > >if we introduce (on my horizon) support for jclouds we could unify all > >under one module. > > > >What is the correct thing to do here? > > > >Thanks > >Amit > >
