On 13.04.17 15:52, Angela Schreiber wrote:
{quote}
I would suggest to go with a naming scheme that reflects how modules
would be grouped together in a hierarchical structure as much as
possible for now. E.g. rename oak-commons-run to oak-run-commons.
{quote}
I would like to address this separately as it would further expand the
scope of OAK-6073, which will be open for review over the weekend. After
that I would suggest that we incorporate the refactoring into oak-trunk.
Works for me, but let's address it quickly afterwards so that those
"intermediate" module names do not get a chance to "stick around".
Michael
