hi michael i created OAK-6101 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6101> as task of OAK-6069 to track any work wrt consistent naming of oak modules. will ping davide there wrt renaming of oak-commons-run
kind regards angela On 19/04/17 16:33, "Michael Dürig" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On 19.04.17 16:26, Angela Schreiber wrote: >>> I'm actually reluctant about 1) and 2) as renaming established modules >>> have quite a ripple effect. As with 3) we already have sub-modules in >>> one place we should probably start a discussion of switching to a >>> hierarchical module structure. >> makes sense to me. >> >>> To address 1) and 2) once the main >>> modularisation effort stabilised. >> to be honest, i think we have more work ahead of us when looking at what >> remains in oak-core right now. >> i guess we would need another discussion here how we want to proceed >>with >> various plugins (mainly to comply with jcr), document nodestores, query >> and security. > >Ack, let's leave it at that. I'm mostly fine with the naming and >renaming existing modules is really not worth the trouble. > >Michael
