Hello oak-dev, the multiplexing node store has been recently extracted from the oak-core into a separate module and I’ve used it as an opportunity to rename the thing. The name I suggested is Federated Node Store. Robert doesn’t agree it’s the right name, mostly because the “partial” node stores, creating the combined (multiplexing / federated) one, are not usable on their own and stores only a part of the overall repository content.
Our arguments in their full lengths can be found in the OAK-6136 (last 3-4 comments), so there’s no need to repeat them here. We wanted to ask you for opinion about the name. We kind of agree that the “multiplexing” is not the best choice - can you suggest something else or maybe you think that “federated” is good enough? Thanks for the feedback. Regards, Tomek -- Tomek Rękawek | Adobe Research | www.adobe.com [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
