Hi Tomek In all related discussions the term "mount" appears a lot. So why not Mounting NodeStore? The module could be "oak-store-mount".
Regards Julian On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Tomek Rekawek <reka...@adobe.com> wrote: > Hello oak-dev, > > the multiplexing node store has been recently extracted from the oak-core > into a separate module and I’ve used it as an opportunity to rename the > thing. The name I suggested is Federated Node Store. Robert doesn’t agree > it’s the right name, mostly because the “partial” node stores, creating the > combined (multiplexing / federated) one, are not usable on their own and > stores only a part of the overall repository content. > > Our arguments in their full lengths can be found in the OAK-6136 (last 3-4 > comments), so there’s no need to repeat them here. We wanted to ask you for > opinion about the name. We kind of agree that the “multiplexing” is not the > best choice - can you suggest something else or maybe you think that > “federated” is good enough? > > Thanks for the feedback. > > Regards, > Tomek > > -- > Tomek Rękawek | Adobe Research | www.adobe.com > reka...@adobe.com >
