Re: Intent to backport to 1.6 and 1.4: OAK-5741

[Michael Dürig]

Back to the list, which I unintentionally dropped.

On 22.05.17 10:19, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2017-05-22 10:16, Michael Dürig wrote:

AFIK this is a new feature, why are we backporting this?

Michael

Because OAK-5704 relies on it.

But why should we backport that on? It is a minor improvement. Unless 
there is a strong reason to do otherwise we should only backport bugs.

Michael