Can anyone please help me on Marcel's comment? Is it already implemented? I really need your help.
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Mostafa Mahdieh <m.mahd...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a comment here (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3424) > from Marcel Reutegger > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=mreutegg>, > suggesting that: > > *"I my view we should change the current behavior and prohibit a > deployment where two cluster nodes are running with the same working > directory and an > automatic clusterId is requested."* > > It seems that this behavior matches my scenario. How can I configure the > oak connection such that this happens? > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> On 2017-08-06 09:08, Mostafa Mahdieh wrote: >> >>> Thanks for your suggestions. >>> >>> I'm wondering what happens in the worst case if I disable the lease >>> check. >>> ... >>> >> >> Repository corruption. >> >> What you need to find out is why the lease renewal fails, not how to turn >> it off. :-) >> > > > > -- > Mostafa Mahdieh > -- Mostafa Mahdieh
