Hi,
Here are some updates regarding the migration:

1) I provided a (draft) PR in https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/296 
with the necessary fixes for the Oak source code and the Oak documentation 
site. Please have a look.

2) For http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/creating-releases.html there is a patch 
attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9440

3) For https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/check-release.sh there 
is a patch attached to  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9440 as well.

4) I would propose to get rid of https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/index.html 
and instead just redirect to https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/index.html 
as the latter provides all relevant information and the former is really 
manually maintained HTML AFAICS. Please tell me in case you think the HTML at 
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/index.html is worth keeping.

Is there anything else which I might have missed?

Konrad


> On 25. May 2021, at 18:42, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The vote passes with the following result:
> 
> +1 (binding): Marcel, Matt and myself.
> 
> I propose to do the change in CW 24 (14th -18th of June). That should give us 
> all enough time to prepare for the switch (which is done by ASF INFRA).
> Since the SVN will stay (with read-only access) we shouldn't break any 
> downstream build jobs. But those will obviously only get the new changes once 
> they switch to Git.
> No need to do it in a big bang though, so hopefully agreeing on a week is 
> enough (as it is hard to align with INFRA on one specific day)
> 
> I am gonna prepare PRs already for documentation updates and the necessary 
> changes for the pom.xmls, so everyone can review prior to the migration and 
> we can merge them afterwards.
> Konrad
> 
> 
>> On 19. May 2021, at 09:24, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> in 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8ea0d827d9e8488183648f2364ecd4e178b6d82e03193735aae6b5cd%40%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E
>>  we discussed moving to Git. After the successful migration of FileVault to 
>> Git we should tackle Oak as well.
>> I am volunteering to trigger the actual work (mostly on ASF INFRA side). I 
>> hereby propose to
>> 
>> 1. migrate the SVN repository at 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/ to a Git repository named 
>> "jackrabbit-oak"
>> 2. migrate GitHub SVN mirror at https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak to 
>> mirror the new native Git repo (at Gitbox)
>> 3. change the main branch name from "trunk" to "main"
>> 4. make the SVN repository read only
>> 
>> Vote is open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1, migrate Oak to Git
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1, because...
>> 
>> 
>> The actual work is tracked in 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9440. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Konrad
> 

Reply via email to