[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13621947#comment-13621947
]
angela commented on OAK-709:
----------------------------
> Indeed, I don't think I claimed otherwise.
no, of course you didn't, but i wasn't sure if you see a simple way without
as usually try to avoid big refactoring as i don't like arguing :-)
> Note that the proposed SecureNodeState intentionally only covers read access
> checks.
sure! i didn't plan anything else....
> Write checks should remain as they are in the existing commit hook.
not that i would have suggested to change this. my point was that the
SecureNodeState needs to keep an immutable tree similar to the way it's
handled in the validators.
> Consider moving permission evaluation to the node state level
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-709
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-709
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
> Attachments:
> 0001-OAK-709-Consider-moving-permission-evaluation-to-the.patch,
> 0001-OAK-709-Consider-moving-permission-evaluation-to-the.patch,
> SecureNodeState.java
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
