[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16545538#comment-16545538
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7589:
---------------------------------------
I made a few more changes on top of your PR. See my [OAK-7589
branch|https://github.com/mreutegg/jackrabbit-oak/tree/OAK-7589], though the
github website is currently down for me. I also left a few TODOs. What do you
think about those?
I was also wondering if {{BinaryDirectDownload}} and {{BinaryDirectUpload}}
should be renamed to simply {{BinaryDownload}} and {{BinaryUpload}}. This would
better match {{JackrabbitValueFactory.initiateBinaryUpload()}}. Furthermore,
simplify {{getDownloadURI()}} to {{getURI()}}? The term download is already
present in the name of the interface.
> [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] Client facing API
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7589
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Technical task
> Reporter: Matt Ryan
> Assignee: Matt Ryan
> Priority: Major
>
> From a discussion w/ [~mreutegg]: Suggested that we move the API changes out
> of oak-jcr (i.e. org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.api.binary.HttpBinaryProvider
> and org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.api.binary.HttpBinaryDownload to a
> different package to avoid unnecessary API changes to oak-jcr.
> This issue should also be used to discuss how exactly the client facing API
> is designed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
