All,

This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open
issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the *removal* of the *DID
Document Resolution*.

In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed
JWT Verification Key Validation techniques:

   1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata
   2. X509 based certificates
   3. DID Document Resolution


Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from
the SD JWT VC specification?

Please note that this *does not *prevent future *extensions*. Interested
parties are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document
Resolution support, if desired.

Please, reply on the *mailing list *with your preference by *October 3rd*.

Regards,
 Rifaat & Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to