I support the removal of DID Document Resolution and hope to see it be the basis for a separate DID Document Resolution extension.
Pierce CONFIDENTIAL From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2025 11:54 AM To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for WG Feedback on DID Resolution in SD-JWT VC All, This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the removal of the DID Document Resolution. In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed JWT Verification Key Validation techniques: 1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata 2. X509 based certificates 3. DID Document Resolution Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from the SD JWT VC specification? Please note that this does not prevent future extensions. Interested parties are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document Resolution support, if desired. Please, reply on the mailing list with your preference by October 3rd. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
