I agree and support the removal.
Am 12.09.25 um 19:19 schrieb Aaron Parecki:
I agree with the removal. I think DID document resolution would be
better served as an extension if anyone wanted to pick up that work.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 9:54 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
<rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open issue in
draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the removal of the DID Document
Resolution.
In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed JWT
Verification Key Validation techniques:
JWT VC Issuer Metadata
X509 based certificates
DID Document Resolution
Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from the SD
JWT VC specification?
Please note that this does not prevent future extensions. Interested parties
are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document Resolution
support, if desired.
Please, reply on the mailing list with your preference by October 3rd.
Regards,
Rifaat & Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list --oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email tooauth-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list --oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email tooauth-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
