agree On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:54 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All, > > This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open > issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the *removal* of the *DID > Document Resolution*. > > In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed > JWT Verification Key Validation techniques: > > 1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata > 2. X509 based certificates > 3. DID Document Resolution > > > Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from > the SD JWT VC specification? > > Please note that this *does not *prevent future *extensions*. Interested > parties are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document > Resolution support, if desired. > > Please, reply on the *mailing list *with your preference by *October 3rd*. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
