I stand corrected and I vote we get rid of all these nasty electrified
fencing!
They are, after all, illegal.
And just for the record I do love animals and children but I don't
think there is too much room here for emotions.


On Jul 22, 8:40 pm, Big Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Occupational Health and Safety Act is quite clear on this matter:
> When an electric fence is installed along a public road or in an urban
> area the user shall-
> (a) As far is practicable mount the electrified wires or articles in
> such positions that persons cannot inadvertenly come into contact
> therewith; and
> (b) display notices conspicuously, warning people that the property is
> protected by an electric fence.
> Children and dogs/cats may not be able to read, therefore (a) applies.
> The Occupational Health and Safety Act over-rules any City by-law.
> I trust that this clarifies the matter and that steps are taken to
> correct the installation, before some-one is electrocuted.
> Thank you for a very interesting topic. I am delighted that you are
> enlightened.
> Please check your electrical installation at home and work.
>
> Brian Gray.
>
> On Jul 22, 2:15 pm, "Absolutely Fabulous Artist" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > i agree
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Julia Teale" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:11 PM
> > Subject: [obsnw] Re: Electric Fencing at Spirit Sister Productions
>
> > > Sorry Demann, you have got it wrong here.  Noisy dogs ward of curious
> > > children and warn their parents to keep an eye on them when passing by.
> > > The
> > > fence is too risky all round.  Kiddies walking home from school unattended
> > > could come to harm and they shouldn't.  Small animals could get badly hurt
> > > or frightened and run into the traffic, causing accidents and losing their
> > > lives.  Yes, people should take care of their kids and pets, most of us
> > > do,
> > > many of us slip up from time to time, kids and dogs go walk-about.  They
> > > should not be in any more danger than they already are.
>
> > > Julia
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Helen Swart" <[email protected]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:29 PM
> > > Subject: [obsnw] Re: Electric Fencing at Spirit Sister Productions
>
> > >> I agree with Jonathan,
> > >> Anything that is a threat to our chidren, pets and ourselves should not
> > >> be
> > >> tolerated.  Children are very inquisitive and touch everything they see.
>
> > >> H
>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Jonathan Endersby" <[email protected]>
> > >> To: <[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:51 PM
> > >> Subject: [obsnw] Re: Electric Fencing at Spirit Sister Productions
>
> > >> Hi
>
> > >> I couldn't disagree with demann more.  A dog makes a big scary noise.
> > >> Toddlers and small children aren't stupid. We're also talking about a
> > >> couple of centimeters between the palisade and the electric wires, you
> > >> could trip, and easily end up touching that wire by mistake.  Children
> > >> like to explore and touch things and I can easily imagine how a parent
> > >> walking with their child might not notice the electric wires a few
> > >> centimeters behind the fence.
>
> > >> As for your argument that people should be able to protect their
> > >> property as they see fit? Where do you draw the line? If I want to put
> > >> a landmine in my garden, is that okay with you? I would assume not...
> > >> So there have to be rules about what is acceptable. Lets find out what
> > >> those rules are and make sure they're being adhered to.
>
> > >> A similar electric fence setup has been installed on the corner of
> > >> Lower Main and Gordon.
>
> > >> regards
> > >> Jonathan.
>
> > >> 2009/7/22 demann <[email protected]>:
>
> > >>> I have to agree with Trevor on this one, I think each person should be
> > >>> entitled to protect their property as they see fit and that there
> > >>> seems to be some emotional prejudice here against electric fencing and
> > >>> a toddler seems to be involved. What are the regulations around dogs
> > >>> and how far they are allowd to be from the outer fence of a property?
> > >>> It has just occured to me that a toddler sticking his hand through a
> > >>> fence with a vicious dog on the other side will come to a lot more
> > >>> harm than one touching an electrified fence. Also I think the
> > >>> toddler's parent/gaudian should be held responsible for such injuries
> > >>> to toddlers and not the object causing the injury. Negligence is a far
> > >>> greater problem than electric fencing!
>
> > >>> On Jul 21, 2:33 pm, Trevor Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:10 PM,
> > >>>> Mitxcoac<[email protected]>
> > >>>> wrote:
>
> > >>>> > The maximum height of electric fence permitted is 450 mm
>
> > >>>> > An electric fence must be at least 1.8m above the ground level at any
> > >>>> > point.
>
> > >>>> That document is confusing to say the least. It also states that the
> > >>>> maximum height for a street facing boundary wall is 1.8 there fore any
> > >>>> electric element above 1,8 must be illegal as it rasie the height ot
> > >>>> the boundary wall over 1.8???????
>
> > >>>> Maybe OR maybe not. But if you read that regulation probably a large
> > >>>> percentage of existing fences in Obs and the city do not comply with
> > >>>> the draft. I don't think electric fencing should necessarily be
> > >>>> specifically picked out in this regard. Has anyone heard of any
> > >>>> verifiable stories of death or serious injury by electric fence. It
> > >>>> seems to be more an emotional issue attached to the use of
> > >>>> electricity.
>
> > >>>> Trev
>
> > >> --
> > >> Jonathan Endersby
> > >> +27 82 4143129
> > >>www.arbitraryuser.com
>
> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
> > >> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.22/2253 - Release Date:
> > >> 07/21/09
> > >> 18:02:00
>
> > >> __________ NOD32 4265 (20090721) Information __________
>
> > >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > >>http://www.eset.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to