Hmmm, we are sure that this is not an Obsid - Vetus Schola initiated thread?


ONLY JOKING !!!!!! 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Bev
Sent: 14 October 2010 7:57 PM
To: The Observatory Neighbourhood watch
Subject: [obsnw] Re: ADT- FYI


Looks as though it's time for loyal ADT "patrons" to get together and talk
things through with Vetus Schola.... ?
Disturbing stuff emerging here....



On Oct 14, 5:50 pm, Rosemary Robins <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have no idea who you are but thanks for your most amusing posting - 
> pity the topic is not as amusing.
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Gill Gimberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Auction anyone?
>
> > Here we have R250! R297 from the madwoman in the corner. R246 
> > (+R133) over there. Going ... Ah R369 from the gentleman in the 
> > suit. R388 - ah, you're matching that one, madam. R437. Come on 
> > everybody - I'm sure this is worth more. R446 on the right. Any more 
> > bids? Going, going ... sold to the gentleman in the front row.
Congratulations, you've been conned.
>
> > ... So what this indicates is that ADT do not have a set rate, for a 
> > set area, for a set level of service. How, then, do they determine 
> > the monthly fee? As I said before: Ridiculous policy / lack of policy.
>
> > As I'm in the <R300 a month category maybe I shouldn't be 
> > complaining. But, how do I know what kind of increase to expect next
year?
>
> > Iain, I'm not unhappy with the service and, until now, I wasn't 
> > unhappy with the monthly fee. Maybe, in the light of all these 
> > different rates (and some more bids may come in), ADT should be 
> > coming up with a more structured policy.
>
> > Gill
>
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:46 PM, catherine
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> Hmmm, I was looking to change from Obs Armed to ADT and they quoted 
> >> 250....
>
> >> Sent from my mobile device
> >> ------------------------------
> >> *From: *Rosemary Robins <[email protected]>
> >> *Sender: *[email protected]
> >> *Date: *Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:37:23 +0200
> >> *To: *<[email protected]>
> >> *ReplyTo: *[email protected]
> >>   *Subject: *Re: [obsnw] ADT- FYI
>
> >> Hmmm -- seems as though I set a cat amongst the pigeons.............
>
> >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Helen Swart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>  The alarm in the wendy house behind the exit at the OCA parking 
> >>> lot is
> >>> 246.34 pm we also get charged 133.95 for patrols..
>
> >>> Helen
>
> >>>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>> *From:* Gill Gimberg <[email protected]>
> >>> *To:* [email protected]
> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:10 PM
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [obsnw] ADT- FYI
>
> >>>  Good idea Trevor.
>
> >>> I'm paying R297.26 incl. VAT and have been a subscriber for - I 
> >>> think - 5 years plus. It is unacceptable that the longer one has 
> >>> been a subscriber, the more one pays! What about loyalty? Ridiculous
policy.
>
> >>> Gill
>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Trevor Hughes
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Gill Gimberg
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>>> I have a contract with ADT. I think this kind of thing is
unacceptable:
> >>>>> either your service is worth the monthly contract fee, or it 
> >>>>> isn't. I have suspected ADT of doing this kind of 
> >>>>> wheeler-dealing, but am not sure yet how to address it. Any 
> >>>>> ideas from anybody else? I realise they need to keep clients, 
> >>>>> but in the long term the non-complaining clients will end up 
> >>>>> paying for the reduced-fee clients, not to mention new contracts at
special prices, etc.
>
> >>>>> Power could be with the people if the people stood together - a
> >>>> difficult thing to organise in OBS. If all ADT subscribers said 
> >>>> we want to pay R200 a month (About R100 less than I am paying) 
> >>>> then it would probably happen. I know I am paying substantially 
> >>>> more than a a frined who has been with them for about 18 months - I
have been a subscriber for 10 years or so.
>
> >>>> Maybe if each ADT subscriber on the group put forward what they 
> >>>> are paying we woudl be able to negotiate a better rate - after 
> >>>> all its the same area and the same service
>
> >>>> I;ll start the ball rolling by saying ADT charge me R369-74 at 
> >>>> home and
> >>>> R388-82 at work (just been increased by 4.4 %)
>
> >>>> Lets hear what you are paying
>
> >>>> Trev
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >>>> Google Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected]<obsnw%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou
> >>>> obsnw+ps.com>
> >>>> .
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at 
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>
> >>> --
> >>> Gill Gimberg
> >>> Editor / Writer
> >>> 084-683 6230
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>> Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<obsnw%2bunsubscr...@googlegroup
> >>> obsnw+s.com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at 
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>
> >>>   --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>> Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<obsnw%2bunsubscr...@googlegroup
> >>> obsnw+s.com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at 
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected] 
> >> obsnw+<obsnw%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at 
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected] 
> >> obsnw+<obsnw%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at 
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > Gill Gimberg
> > Editor / Writer
> > 084-683 6230
>
> >   --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
<obsnw%[email protected]>.
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> >http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.

Reply via email to